batting .500 on xfree86-4.0 install

[Suhaib Siddiqi]

> So, the new dll did eliminate the "back" error, but not the "Direct Draw"
> error.   Somehow I think the "back" error is a red herring.  Maybe I just
> have a weird video card/driver here.
>


WHAT NEW DLLS?  PLEASE DO NOT HAVE CUSTOM VERSIONS OF FIXED/MODIFIED
EXECUTABLES
AND DLLS FLOATING AROUND.  YOU WILL MAKE MY LIFE HECK OF TROUBLE.  I WOULD
NOT KNOW WHAT CHANGED YOU MADE, WERE THOSE CHANGES WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN
INCORPORATED INTO OFFICIAL RELEASES.

sUHAIB


>
> Thx for your support.
>
> ZU,
>     Cronin
>     <vining@zts.com>
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: cygwin-xfree-owner@sources.redhat.com
> >[ mailto:cygwin-xfree-owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of Harold Hunt
> >Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 10:40 PM
> >To: cygwin-xfree@sourceware.cygnus.com
> >Subject: RE: batting .500 on xfree86-4.0 install
> >
> >
> >I'm sending Cronin a test dll that does not allocate a back
> >buffer for the
> >screen, because, as far as I can tell, the back buffer is not needed.
> >
> >Harold
> >