[ANNOUNCEMENT] Shadow Framebuffer Test 4

Andreas Eibach a.eibach@gmx.net
Sun Apr 1 00:00:00 GMT 2001


----- Original Message -----
From: "Harold Hunt" <huntharo@msu.edu>
To: "Cygx (E-mail)" <cygwin-xfree@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 11:58 PM
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Shadow Framebuffer Test 4


> Failure to allocate a device independent bitmap in Shadow Framebuffer Test
> server has nothing to do with video drivers.  It most likely has to do
with
> a lack of available memory or a particular bitfield format not being
> supported by the running version of Windows.

Out of curiosity, Harold:
You said in one of the older posts that there won't ever be a stable
framebuffer-based X server for W9x/Me, right?
What is (technically, that is) the difference between a shadow-framebuffer X
server like this and your old 'Test 7'`?

Andreas




More information about the Cygwin-xfree mailing list