Xos.h and sys/un.h conflict

[Alan Hourihane]

On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:54:11PM -0400, Suhaib Siddiqi wrote:
> Alan,
> 
> He is correct.
> 
I didn't say he wasn't. I just wanted to know more about the specific's.

> defined(__CYGWIN__) should be removed now or it should be changed to
> 
> (defined(__CYGWIN__) && !defined(UNIXCONN))
> 
> I prefer second choice.  In case someone does not want to use UNIXCONN. He
> will have a choice to #define X_NO_SYS_UN by removing UNIXCOM define from
> cygwin.cf.
> 
> It is left over from old days when I was working on XF86 3.3.x and Cygwin
> did not have sys/un.h headers.
> 
Sure. I think we'll need to do a bit of a search through the code for
excessive __CYGWIN__ defines to see if anymore are lurking from the 3.3.x
days.

Alan.