Xfree 86/Cygwin & NT

[Robert Collins]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jorge Goncalvez" <goncal11@mail.bsf.alcatel.fr>
To: <cygwin-xfree@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 6:52 PM
Subject: Re:Xfree 86/Cygwin & NT


> Hi, thank you for your help Pavel and Suhaib but my Cygwin/Xfree86 still
doesn't
> work.
>
> I use Xfree 4.03 under Winnt.Actually I successfully installed
Cygwin/free86 in
> my Windows 98 SE and I decided to port it to a NT machine.
> I copied c:\Cygwin and I ran Xfree with the command:
> C:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin\XWin.exe -screen 0 800x600x16
> and I have the following

"Copying cygwin" won't transfer the mount table and path. Run Cygwin's
setup.exe and install cygwin. Then try again.

Rob

>
> Couldn't open RGB_DB '/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb'
> _XSERVTransmkdir: Owner of /tmp/.X11-unix should be set to root
>
> winDetectSupportedEngines () - Windows NT/2000
> winDetectSupportedEngines () - DirectDraw installed
> winDetectSupportedEngines () - Allowing PrimaryDD
> winDetectSupportedEngines () - Returning, supported engines 0000000b
> winSetEngine () - Using Shadow DirectDraw
> winCreateBoundingWindowWindowed () - WindowClient width 794 height 546
> winInitVisualsShadowDD () - Masks: 0000f800 000007e0 0000001f bpRGB: 6
> winInitVisualsShadowDD () - Returning
> PEXExtensionInit: Couldn't open default PEX font file  Roman_M
> error opening security policy file
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xserver/SecurityPolicy
> Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/, removing
from l
> ist!
> Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,
removing from
>  list!
> Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/, removing
from
> list!
> Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/, removing
from li
> st!
> Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/, removing
from
> list!
> Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/,
removing from
>  list!
>
> Fatal server error:
> could not open default font 'fixed'
>
>
>
> In fact I don't understand why it works fine in 98 SE and not in NT or
2000.
> I only took the same files in both.
>
> Thank you.
>
>