[ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 22
Christopher Faylor
cgf@redhat.com
Thu May 3 14:57:00 GMT 2001
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 05:45:08PM -0400, Suhaib Siddiqi wrote:
>I think it is ok to cygz.dll. This argument will not bring much,
>but I do say it was a bad idea to fork libz.dll from X source last year
>and stick into contrib.
I don't know why you are thinking that this came from X. You could also
claim that it came from Java or the Cygwin setup program. Both of those
use zlib. Neither of those is the owner or originator of the code.
cgf
More information about the Cygwin-xfree
mailing list