XDMCP on Windows 95

[Harold L Hunt II]

Sylvain,

I am not understanding why your response was appropriate.  The default 
port for XDM has nothing to do with Microsoft, unless Microsoft has 
decided to use port 177 for one of their products.  If that was the 
case, then a simple mention that ``Product Foo'' uses port 177 would 
have been sufficient, right?

Harold

Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
>  --- Alexander Gottwald <Alexander.Gottwald@s1999.tu-chemnitz.de> a
> écrit : > J S wrote:
> 
>>>Fatal server error:
>>>XDMCP fatal error: Session declined No valid address
>>>
>>>And yes I have read the FAQ and used the -from flag. There aren't
>>
>>any errors 
>>
>>>in the xdm logs, so I tried to run the xdm in debug:
>>>
>>>xdm -udpPort 6556 -nodaemon -debug 10 -config 
>>
>>Why this port? The default port is 177.
> 
> Alexander, this exactly Microsoft problem : M$ is building its products
> thinking all people is using defaults, hiding some bugs that appear
> only in some cases. 
> 
> Lets f*ck the student case ! We're in real life !
> 
> =====
> Sylvain Petreolle
> spetreolle@users.sourceforge.net 
> Fight against Spam ! http://www.euro.cauce.org/en/index.html
> ICQ #170597259
> 
> "Don't think you are. Know you are." Morpheus in Matrix, chapter 15.
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Soyez solidaire soutenez l’action du Téléthon avec Yahoo! France.
> http://www1.telethon.fr/030-Espace-Relais-Dons/webtirelire1.asp?hebergeur_id=1309