problems with XFree
Tom Bozack
bozackt1@ridgecrest.ca.us
Tue Jul 23 02:13:00 GMT 2002
I think Cygwin/XFree86 is a great product -- but there is nothing so
good that it can't be improved. I agree with all of you comments,
although I haven't had the system reboot experience.
One persistant problem that you didn't mention (manybe you haven't run
into it yet) is a very persistent and repeatable lock-up when used to
login to another host using XDMCP. The symptom is of a sudden large
memory leak after 15-30 minutes of use. XFree86 becomes unresponsive,
system memory and swap resources are rapidly used up, and finally
XFree86 crashes with a seg fault. This also happens immediately (you
don't have to wait 15-30 min) when you logoff the host and login again.
I've experienced this under Windows 98/98SE/ME.
For me this is a showstopper since it makes Cygwin/XFree86 unusable as
an X server platform. It's fun to play with, but this "bug" makes it
unacceptable for routine use as an X server.
Tom
gsroka@mmsa.com wrote:
> (last email I sent complained about HTML MIME. i hope i'm not
> double-posting)
>
> I started playing with XFree last week. It's been a few years since I've
> used UNIX, so you can call me a newbie, if you like. I'm running Windows
> 2000 Pro on a P4 1.7 GHz with 768 MiB of RAM and 10 GB free on my hard
> drive. I (eventually) did a full Cygwin/XFree86 download and install
> (binaries, not source).
>
> Please don't flame me if I'm out of line. I didn't know if I should break
> this up into several emails or have one big one. Also, please send
> responses to me by email.
>
> Here are my obervations/problems.
> Showstoppers:
> 1) The very first time I brought up the X server, I had modified
> startxwin.bat
> to use wmaker instead of twm. It crashed because /home
> hadn't been created yet. This was "fixed" by running the text-mode bash
> icon first.
> 2) when I run Xman, it says "No App-Defaults File". If I run "Xman -notop"
>
> instead, I can browse one man page, and then it stops working. (it gives a
>
> "likeToSave" message box with yes and no buttons that don't seem to do
> anything.) It seems to be related to missing a locale binary. Is there a
> way to get this to work?
> 3) within the first few hours of usage, I ran a "find / -name abc -print"
> from the command-line, and my trusty Windows 2000 box restarted. no blue
> screen, no error. it was like someone pulled the power plug and plugged it
>
> back in. after it came up, i tried the same command and it worked fine.
> 4) i had a similar "restart" to #6 when I ran setup.exe while cygwin was
> up. of course, bad user, i should have stopped cygwin before running
> setup, but i'm still amazed at how easily my robust kernel, based on NT
> Technology, came down.
>
> Nice-to-haves:
> 5) it'd be nice if setup.exe showed the size (in bytes or megabytes, etc.)
>
> of each package (it's in setup.ini). on my 56 Kb/s modem, downloading a
> large, unnecessary file takes a painfully long time, but a small
> unnecessary file is not so bad.
> 6) on that note, how about displaying those nice descriptions from
> setup.ini in setup.exe so we can see what the packages are before
> downloading them. a resizable window would come in handy for this.
> 7) the first time I downloaded (a partial download, not full), i picked
> "more" and "clear", but next time I went into setup.exe, it had
> "forgotten" that. perhaps if I can unrust my C, I can fix some of these
> bugs myself. give me a few weeks.
> 8) the XFree86-fnts package is 16 MiB. it's kind of big. the first time i
> downloaded from http:uiuc, it got 98% and stopped responding--1 hour
> wasted (at 56 Kb). the second time (no joke) it got 99% and
> stopped--another hour wasted. so i copied it from somewhere else.
> 9) my X clients on an AIX box didn't work because i didn't use the -kb
> switch on XWin. but i found that one on the faq. a possible enhancement to
>
> setup.exe?
> 10) using K (or Ki) and B for byte on setup.exe is always nice. make sure
> to leave a space between the number and the unit. 10 KB, not 10KB. how
> about estimated download time in addition to % ?
> 11) also, what's all that /b stuff about in startxwin.bat? gotos, etc. but
>
> there is no /b ! (there is no spoon either ;-)
>
>
> Please no one take offense at all this. I'm not trying to throw blame. It
> seems like a great product, so far (except for the deadly restarts). These
>
> are perhaps suggestions for doing it better. I know some coworkers who
> tried to get this to work, but gave up because of the problems. So will
> the average newbie or the busy IT pro who doesn't have time to read lots
> of faqs and will buy Exceed instead. I hope my observations will help
> others.
>
> Gabriel Sroka
> gsroka at mmsa dot com
>
More information about the Cygwin-xfree
mailing list