X11 and Heavy loadbalancing?

[choice15@gmx.de]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Papa Fox" <papafox888@hotmail.com>
To: <cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 2:53 AM
Subject: Re: X11 and Heavy loadbalancing?


> Hi,
>
> I *think* I understand what choice15@gmx.de is trying to do.  The normal
> term for what he is attempting is host integration.  This is where
> host-based applications are integrated into web-based applications.  The
> most common example of this is the IBM product Host On Demand.
>
> The obvious way to do host integration with X Windows is to use the same
> approach as HOD.  Use a java applet implementation of X (WeirdX) and place
> the applet in a web page.  This approach has the same problem as HOD - a
> very heavy applet download.
>
> PapaFox
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Randall R Schulz" <rrschulz@cris.com>
> To: <cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 9:24 AM
> Subject: Re: X11 and Heavy loadbalancing?
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since the native GUI model for Java programs running on Unix and Linux
> > hosts is X11, any and all Java GUI applications running on such hosts
are
> > inherently able to have their human user interaction take place on a
> > separate host (or X terminal) from the host on which they execute.
> > Likewise, multiple application clients (in the X sense of client--an
> > application that wants to interact with a user via keyboard, moust and
> > raster display) can share a single server (again, in the X sense--i.e.,
> > user interaction hardware). This should make it possible to handle
> > migration or load balancing of the Java application while the user
remains
> > at a single workstation.
> >
> > So, any Java software with an AWT or Swing GUI when running on a Unix
> > platform with X support (all of them except MacOS X, I believe) should
be
> > able to do what I think you're contemplating.
> >
> > Now usually one does not put conventional Java GUIs on J2EE applications
> > (to my limited knowledge), but I doubt there's any technical reason why
it
> > could not be done.
> >
> > Is this at all an answer to your question?
> >
> > Randall Schulz
> > Mountain View, CA USA
> >
> >
> > At 02:14 2002-11-15, choice15@gmx.de wrote:
> > >Hi all,
> > >
> > >At my Connectiontoolprojekt (Win-GUI-Client for Cygwin)
> > >i have think by my self whats happend if a heavy load Situation is
> comming
> > >up and How can it be solved?
> > >
> > >Is there an Way to Make XFree scalable or is there an J2EE based
> Container
> > >for a Free XFree avaiable thadt can be integrated as Part  of a Java
> > >Serverapplication-
> > >Cluster such as ORACLE 9iAS Appserver Modul?
> > >
> > >(Oracle self has implemented an E-Mailserver, na Fileserver, an
> Faxserver,
> > >  LDAP and so  thadt resides in the Applicationserver Middlewarelayer,
> thadt
> > >can be empowered by an Oracle Realapplication Cluster thadt Spans over
> the
> > >  Network to other Machines they are Member of the Cluster)
> > >
> > >If no Project is launched at this Time then my X.NET Projekt at
> > >Sourceforge will by Upgraded to this Projektfeature.
> > >
> > >http://sourceforge.net/projects/ibsxnet/
> > >
> > >Greetings
> >
> >
> > Randy
> >
>