[RFC]: Breaking out fontconfig and freetype into seperate packages
Harold L Hunt II
huntharo@msu.edu
Sat Aug 2 01:27:00 GMT 2003
Nicholas,
Can you explain to me what fontconfig and freetype2 are, specifically?
Do they consist of a couple libraries and some executables?
How many files are involved in a package that contains them?
Are any of their libraries linked to from within the standard XFree86
distribution?
The reason I ask these questions is that I am all for splitting out
fontconfig and freetype2, as long as I can cleanly exclude them from the
packaging scripts and if I don't have to do too much recompiling when
new fontconfig/freetype2 packages are released.
Answer those questions and we can think about it.
Harold
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> Harold,
>
> Would you be against having someone else maintain the freetype2 &
> fontconfig packages external of XFree86 sources? There are a couple of
> reasons for wanting this:
>
> 1)Freetype & fontconfig aren't necessarily X libraries and they don't
> specifically require X. Some non-X packages are starting to use it, and
> others will follow in the future. Also, it is possible that one could
> link them to a hybrid w32api/cygwin gui application.
>
> 2)XFree86 is notorious for lagging behind the current releases,
> especially in respect to fontconfig.
>
> 3)Most all of the major linux vendors do this, and have been doing it
> for quite some time now.
>
> 4)It means less work and less to download each time there's an update to
> some other XFree86 library or binary.
>
> I've been tracking current sources and have working packaging scripts
> for both. If you are interested, I'd be willing to do an ITP in
> cygwin-apps, having them target the /usr prefix as opposed to /usr/X11R6.
>
> Also, I'd like to do an ITP for ttmkfdir, but I'll hold off on that
> until we get this request squared away.
>
> Cheers,
> Nicholas
>
>
More information about the Cygwin-xfree
mailing list