DDD 3.3.8 (i686-pc-cygwin) gets `Segmentation fault WAS Re: c ompiling DDD

[Harold L Hunt II]

Richard Campbell wrote:

>>The problem is not with Cygwin's LessTif... the problem is in how DDD is 
>>detecting LessTif on Cygwin.  It must be assuming that the file name for 
>>the import library with be of the format foo.a whereas the name is of 
>>the format foo.dll.a on Cygwin.
> 
> 
> This would be detection inside the actual execution, then?  The link step 
> is libtoolized and ends up being:
> 
> g++ -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -W -Wall -trigraphs -o ddd.exe ddd.o basename.o
> compare.o cook.o cwd.o glob.o 
> <snip many more *.o files>
> UndoBuffer.o UndoBE.o WhatNextCB.o configinfo.o  -L/usr/X11R6/lib
> .libs/libimp-cygXm-2.a -lXft -lXrender .libs/libimp-cygfontconfig-1.a
> .libs/libimp-cygfreetype-6.a -lz .libs/libimp-cygexpat-0.a -lXaw -lXmu -lXt
> -lXpm -lXp -lXext -lX11 -lSM -lICE -lncurses -ly ../libiberty/libiberty.a
> -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib
> 
> Which looks sorta automagic for the dlls, right?

I'm not an expert (or even a user of DDD), but it wouldn't be the first 
time if I saw something detected incorrectly in configure (picking Motif 
versus LessTif), followed by a clean compile, followed by a crash on 
execution.

Remember, Motif and LessTif are supposed to have the same interface, so 
code written for either should compile and link against the other, but 
the code may not work (segfault).  So, I would suspect that DDD's 
configure is detecting Motif (or assuming Motif by default), compiling 
some conditional segments for Motif instead of for LessTif (introducing 
buggy code), followed by linking with LessTif (leading to a crash when 
the code that works with Motif but not LessTif is run).

Again, this is speculation, but that is where I would be looking at the 
moment.

Harold