partnership with the Xouvert project?

[Jonathan Walther]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:22:42AM +0100, Pau Aliagas wrote:
>I've just subscribed to the list to tell you the same thing about arch and
>xouvert. Some small problems have arisen using arch in cygwin and there
>was a consensus that changes needed to be applied to cygwin to have a nice
>and full support. The problems were related to path lengths and, maybe, 
>you could help us with this issue. It would be a nice initial cooperation.

I don't think path lengths are an issue at the moment, for the Xouvert
project to be able to work with Cygwin.  The issue that is important is
the file renaming issue.  I've posted to the mailing list to let Tom
know that Cygwin support is important to us; hopefully he will reply
soon.

Jonathan

-- 

    It's not true unless it makes you laugh,                           
             but you don't understand it until it makes you weep.      

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

                     Geek House Productions, Ltd.

  Providing Unix & Internet Contracting and Consulting,
  QA Testing, Technical Documentation, Systems Design & Implementation,
  General Programming, E-commerce, Web & Mail Services since 1998

Phone:   604-951-4142
Email:   djw@reactor-core.org
Webpage: http://reactor-core.org
Address: 13685 Hilton Road, Surrey, BC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-xfree/attachments/20031029/c2191bcf/attachment.sig>