2 instances of Xwin

[aroushdi]

Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> Amr Mohamed Roushdi wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hi Alex it is me again . I am enclosing the strace fot the 1st instance
>>good and the 2nd instance which blew out .
>>thks for ur help
> 
> 
> from tracegood
> 
>   310 2041721 [main] xwin 2284 cygwin_socket: 6 = socket (2, 2, 0)
>   429 2042150 [main] xwin 2284 cygwin_setsockopt: setsockopt optval=1
>   323 2042473 [main] xwin 2284 cygwin_setsockopt: 0 = setsockopt (6, 65535, 20 (SO_BROADCAST), 0x22EF84, 4)
>   672 2043145 [main] xwin 2284 cygwin_bind: 0 = bind (6, 0x769BD0, 16)
> 
> from trace
> 
>   304 2658029 [main] xwin 2312 cygwin_socket: 6 = socket (2, 2, 0)
>   321 2658350 [main] xwin 2312 cygwin_setsockopt: setsockopt optval=1
>   311 2658661 [main] xwin 2312 cygwin_setsockopt: 0 = setsockopt (6, 65535, 20 (SO_BROADCAST), 0x22EF84, 4)
>   449 2659110 [main] xwin 2312 __set_winsock_errno: bind:477 - winsock error 10048 -> errno 112
>   306 2659416 [main] xwin 2312 cygwin_bind: -1 = bind (6, 0x769BD0, 16)
> 
> the winsock error 10048 is WSAEADDRINUSE which means another program is using
> the port. Up to this bind the logs are nearly identical (only differs in
> process ids, the :5 vs :10 and some small differences with pointers and
> handles returned from windows). The logs are about 7 minutes apart. Does it
> usually work again after 5 - 7 minutes have passed after a failed attempt?
> 
> bye
>     ago
> NP: Imperative Reaction - Arrogance
the following appeared today in the announcement is it the same as the 
module suggested
thanks again and it works fine with the clipboard
amr
*** xorg-x11-xwin-gl-6.7.0.0-12

Changes
=======

2004-07-20 Alexander Gottwald <ago@freedesktop.org>

         * xc/programs/Xserver/xdmcp.c (get_addr_by_name):
	Bugzilla #889: Bind -from address to port number 0 instead of 177

-- Alexander Gottwald