Should 6.8.99.901-1 be marked experimental?

[Alan Hourihane]

On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 13:31 -0700, James R. Phillips wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> AFAICT there is no release announcement for 6.8.99.901-1, and there are several
> bug reports requiring manual intervention or downgrades.  In fact I am
> experiencing lockups myself, and had to downgrade.
> 
> This being the case (no release announcement + egregious regressions),
> shouldn't 6.8.99.901-1 be marked as experimental, so people don't upgrade to it
> semi-automatically?

If you haven't already, bugs should be filed at...

http://bugs.freedesktop.org 

under the xorg component.

Alan.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:                   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/