DDraw Blt vs BltFast

[Robert Collins]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:52 PM
> To: cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: DDraw Blt vs BltFast
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 06:06:16PM -0500, Harold Hunt wrote:
> >> > Fine.  But how do you implement them on 9x/Me?
> >>Perhaps the same way I implemented FIFO's, but easier as 
> the semantics 
> >>seem less complex to me.
> >>
> >>Anyway, sure we don't need to have bot NT and 9x all at the same 
> >>time...
> >
> >Sounds logical to me.  There is no reason to limit the 
> performance on 
> >Windows NT/2000/XP just because there would need to be a seperate 
> >routine for Windows 95/98/Me.
> 
> I'm glad it sounds logical.  Cygwin already has lots of code 
> that is NT specific, e.g., CYGWIN=ntsec.

I agree. I got the impression from Corinna's email that what Ralf was
suggesting needed a 9x equivalent to be seriously considered. I'm not
100% sure why I got that impression though....

Rob