Hey hey, I now have the emacs 100% cpu usage bug too [CGF, this one is for you]

[Harold L Hunt II]

On a side note, I didn't see an answer to my question about why the 
cygwin1.dll version number does not agree with the cygwin package 
version number (1.3.15-1 vs. 1.3.15-2, respectively).  Is setup.exe 
goofing, was the version number of the DLL not bumped on accident, or 
are the version numbers commonly out of agreement for valid reasons?

Harold

David Starks-Browning wrote:

>On Friday 15 Nov 02, Christopher Faylor writes:
>  
>
>>Note that there were multiple snapshots generated yesterday so if you
>>grabbed one and it didn't work, it's worthwhile to grab the latest.
>>    
>>
>
>Multiple versions dated 2002-11-14?
>
>Could that explain why Bill still sees the problem with his 2002-11-14
>snapshot?
>
>David
>
>  
>